top of page
Gemini_Generated_Image_xio3cgxio3cgxio3-scaled.png

"Attachment distorts reality, since it is an attempt to stop a flow. If you stand in a river and attempt to stop the flow of water, pressure builds up. The water begins to swirl around and is no longer on its natural course."

Santacitta Bhikkhuni
“The Flow of Life”

Somatics often involves becoming less rigid and more responsive to present-moment bodily experience. In this sense, some practitioners find resonance with contemplative traditions that describe life's obstacles as a form of clinging or resistance to life’s ongoing movement.

How somatic patterns are understood in this work​

Somatic traditions often notice recurring patterns in how experience can show up in the body. These are not fixed meanings or diagnostic rules, but rather commonly observed patterns that can support awareness and exploration.

​

Some frequently discussed associations include:

​

  • Jaw / mouth / throat — holding back expression, difficulty speaking, tension around voice or emotion

  • Neck / shoulders — responsibility, vigilance, chronic readiness or holding

  • Chest / heart area — grief, sadness, vulnerability, relational pain

  • Diaphragm / solar plexus — anxiety, control, activation, bracing

  • Belly / gut — fear responses, intuition, shame, survival stress

  • Pelvis / hips — boundaries, sexuality, power, immobilisation, defensive holding

  • Hands / arms — action impulses such as reaching, pushing away, protection

  • Legs / feet — grounding, mobility, flight responses, stability

  • Back — protection, bracing, sense of support or lack of support

​

In somatic work, these patterns are generally understood through the lens of nervous system organisation rather than symbolic meaning alone. For example:

​

  • Tight legs may reflect a mobilised “ready to move” response

  • A collapsed chest may reflect conservation or shutdown states

  • Chronic shoulder tension may reflect sustained protective activation

​

A key distinction in this approach is that there are no fixed emotional maps of the body.  Rather than assigning meaning to a specific area (for example, “this equals grief” or “this equals anger”), the emphasis is on direct experience and inquiry:

​

  • What is happening in the body right now, and how might that shift as you notice it?

  • Is there an impulse toward movement? Or expression?  Or do you feel protection is necessary, even in a subtle way?

  • How would you describe the overall quality of the body in this moment - do you feel tense, settled, easy, or somewhere in between?

​

In this way, the focus remains on tracking how experience is organised in the present moment, rather than interpreting the body through fixed emotional associations.

bottom of page